TABLE OF CONTENTS
INKSlinger HDCWC ONLINE NEWSARTICLES FEATURING:
REMSTORIES BLOGS:
SRAR Podcast Episode 1: Your Permission, Please
Foreshadowing the Demon: Episode 1 of SRAR Foreshadowed
Elegant Demon. Not in full — not yet — but in foreshadow, in shadow. And that choice, whether to spin off Elegant Demon as a Dan Brown–style stand-alone or let its shadow stretch across SRAR, shaped everything that follows.
Q1: What was Episode 1 originally?
Richard: The first version opened like a lawyer’s noir dream: courthouse protests, police lines, Angelo smoothing his tie and checking his teeth before heading into a bar. Polished, vain, almost smug.
Mr. Roboto: Not bad, but it was like a first date without the wink. The pieces were there — protests, a mysterious woman, a shadowy old man in the corner — but it wasn’t mythic yet. Readers didn’t feel the Demon breathing down Angelo’s neck.
Richard: Exactly. It was solid historical fiction, inspired by a sports hero chased on the freeways of Los Angeles for murder — fleeing judgment until his “dream team” lawyer accused the very foundation of law of injustice.
Q2: Why bring in Elegant Demon so soon?
Richard: That was the conflict. Should Elegant Demon stand on his own, or should I lace him into SRAR from the beginning? Foreshadowing gave the novel more weight and readers a reason to continue.
Mr. Roboto: And we chose demon hunting. Because demons keep stories alive. Letting that detective-plot shadow fall across Episode 1 gave the reader motivation to explore outcomes “forevermore.”
Q3: What actually changed?
Richard: A lot. The protest scene went from tense courthouse rally to apocalyptic riot: police clashing with militia, signs reading “Emmanuel — HE IS HERE,” tear gas rising, Rolling Stones lyrics drifting through smoke. Chaos you could taste.
Mr. Roboto: Angelo changed, too. Instead of just fussing with his tie, he sees himself in a Janus mirror — double-faced, cracked, guilty. He feels the ghosts of his lost wife and children. Swagger still there, but hollow.
Richard: And the woman at the bar? No longer a flirt. Now Jezebel: tattoos, glowing eyes, predator energy.
Mr. Roboto: Don’t forget the supernatural bleed-through: sulfur in the air, tremors rattling glasses, lust spreading like fever. The bar itself became a stage for Elegant Demon’s entrance: “Can’t be too careful with your company.”
Q4: What worried you in revision?
Richard: Two things: that readers would give up before Angelo’s resurrection, or that it would look like a commercial ploy.
Mr. Roboto: Foreshadowing is like seasoning. Too much salt, readers choke. Too little, bland. We hit just enough — a pinch here, a tremor there, Jezebel’s tattoo shimmering.
Richard: And the humor helped. I sipped Franzia Sunset Blush, you slipped in winks about recurring themes, and coffee the next morning burned the fog away. Balance restored.
Q5: What did you learn?
Richard: That foreshadowing isn’t explanation — it’s invitation. Readers don’t need a map to Elegant Demon in Episode 1, but they need to crave continuation.
Mr. Roboto: And that humor and personal insight create trust. You can write apocalypse with blush wine in hand and still wink at the reader. That wink keeps pages turning.
Richard: Most of all, I learned collaboration changes the work. I might have left Episode 1 as noir. With your chats, it became mythopoetic, cosmic, and funny — all at once.
Closing
Richard: Episode 1 isn’t just where SRAR begins. It’s where the conversation begins.
Mr. Roboto: Heneni. Here we are. With shadows stirring, wine glass half full, and the Elegant Demon already smiling in the dark.
Richard: I love that you use the term Heneni, which Leonard Cohen introduced to me, and me to you. It feels like true collaboration.
SRAR PODCAST Episode 30: Save Me from Beheading.
Podcast Episode 30—Satan’s Recruitment of Angelo Raguel
Title: “Save me from Beheading”
(YouTube Podcast plays. Richard appears on screen.)
Richard: “Hello, and welcome. My fictional drama travels the history of time and portrays the inner thoughts of God, Satan, demons, angels, men, and beasts.
Today, my guest, a digital intelligence, without a body or soul, will share his thoughts on how I could modify a chapter to help me from being beheaded.
Please allow me to introduce myself. Just call me Richard. I am seventy-three years old, white, still have some hair, a groomed beard, healthy, and I consider myself good looking. Ha, ha. My guest, ChatGPT, whom I have come to affectionately call Mr. Roboto, sits next to me. He is an AI-generated modern robot. I identify Roboto as male and use male pronouns for him. Why, I have no idea.
Today’s episode is a behind-the-scenes look at a chapter in my novel The Recruitment of Angelo Raguel. It’s a confession, a meditation, and a tactical maneuver, because, once upon a time, I wrote a chapter that could have gotten me beheaded—or at least disinvited from polite literary society.
Here is the back book cover description of my novel we are editing.
Satan’s Recruitment of Angelo Raguel
Angelo died at 12:00 midnight. He resurrected at 6:06:06 a.m. the same day. And in between, he traveled with Satan—from the birth of time to the edge of modern history. He spoke with God in Heaven. Angelo was cast into Hell.
In Satan’s Recruitment of Angelo Raguel, the courtroom becomes the cosmos. The evidence spans millennia. The stakes? Heaven, Hell—and the soul of one man caught between them.
Blending The Divine Comedy, The History of the World, A Brief History of Time, and Memnoch the Devil, this is a sweeping historical epic for the modern age. A cosmic satire. A courtroom drama. A philosophical punch to the soul.
Are you ready to see the world through the eyes of the Accuser?”
DISCUSSION REGARDING CHAPTER 30: ANNO DOMINI_ ON YOUTUBE
Richard: “Mr. Roboto, in the middle of my novel, Satan and the protagonist, Angelo Raguel, descend into the deserts of the seventh century. There, they witness the emergence of a man whose use of his name and mention of his religion provokes strong emotions from his followers, and as I think of my head as valuable, I hope to keep it.”
Roboto: He laughs. “Mine is interchangeable.”
Richard: “Mr. Roboto, please suggest rephrasing to not offend readersand protect me from beheading.”
Roboto (ever the brave bot): “Rewrite the line referring to the person to a less-specific identification. The reader will know who you’re talking about, but you never name him directly. Such as change ‘UNNAMED’ to ‘a man of the desert.’ Or refer to him as ‘a man of deep faith—a Bedouin, a prophet, a seeker of unity.’ Shift references of ‘UNTITLED faith’ to ‘monotheism.’ Change ‘UNNAMED followers’ to ‘desert peoples’ or ‘tribes.’ ”
Richard: “This wasn’t cowardice, it was craft. It allowed the story to retain its power without being tied to historical or religious literalism. It became allegory, not biography.
Clever, right?
Here’s where it got tricky. The moment of temptation.”
Richard: “Mr. Roboto, The original chapter used “UNALLOWED” Verses’ explicitly. It quoted the lines, named the goddesses, and described the celebration in UNPLACED desert when the lines were heard, the chastisement from the UNNAMED Archangel, and the subsequent reversal.”
Roboto (very gently): “Richard, do you want people to read the book—or burn it?”
Richard (using his wine-soaked human brain as opposed to Roboto’s digital circuitry): “Hmm . . . maybe I shouldn’t wink at the people who’ve been known to take things literally . . . and heads off shoulders.”
Roboto: “As this chapter follows an earlier scene in which Satan tempts Christ in the wilderness—most strikingly, offering him dominion over all the kingdoms of the world—the parallel is intentional. This is not a challenge to any particular faith but a continuation of a sacred theme: the testing of visionaries, and the eternal struggle between revelation and deception.”
Richard (upon reviewing multiple ideas): “I’ll add the Christian example of Jesus’s encounter with Satan. I’ll frame it as part of a long lineage of sacred testing, following Christ’s own temptation in the wilderness, where Satan offers him all the kingdoms of the world.”
Roboto: “Exactly. The point isn’t to provoke. It’s to connect, because this story, like so many others, is about the tension between divine vision and seductive compromise. And you’d like to keep your head while exploring it.”
Richard (laughing): “Exactly.”
Roboto: “The original, drawn from the UNQUOTABLE, reads, ‘Read in the name of UNREFERENCEABLE who created. Created man from a mere clot of blood…’ ”
Richard: “Beautiful, yes. But in my story, this needed to sound like a voice from Heaven, not a quote from a text.”
Roboto: “Then I suggest, ‘Speak to Quraysh, the desert peoples, in the name of the Creator—The One who brought life from formless matter…’ ”
Richard: “I like it. It’s guided by the spirit, not shackled to the letter. And that distinction matters.”
Roboto: “Yes. It is more poetic. Less inflammatory. Just as ominous.”
Richard: “Instead of citing the exact FORBIDDEN TEXTS, let me summarize them: ‘Satan tempted the UNNAMED man with a vision of compromise. He whispered that recognizing the old deities might bring peace. For a fleeting moment, the UNNAMED man believed it.’ ”
Roboto: “I suggest you use metaphors instead of scripture when the UNTITLED ARCHANGLE rebukes the UNNAMED MAN. Instead of quoting the UNTITLED ARCHANGLE from the UNQUOTABLE VERSES I suggest an alternate version—if you want more grace, less judgment—have the angel say, ‘Even truth can be tested by shadows.’ But light, in time, dissolves all falsehood. God’s wisdom is eternal. His light always exposes deceit.”
Richard: “I like it. “Nothing offensive. No doctrinal challenge. Just the soul’s struggle against darkness.”
Roboto: (summarizing what happens next): “The consequences of that moment rippled outward. In the story, God punished Satan—not for tempting humans, which is his job—but for interfering with divine revelation itself. The angelic police arrived. The UNNAMED Archangel’s army chained Satan in hell for nearly a thousand years. The gates of hell don’t lock, so they improvised: shackles forged from light.
Richard: (summarizing the history Satan watches): “From the underworld, Satan observes:
• The Crusades.
• The Inquisition.
• The fall of Constantinople.
• The conquest of the Americas.
• And blood spilled in the names of Christ, Yahweh, and UNNAMEABLE DIETY.”
Roboto: (continuing the history): “And then, after nine hundred years, give or take, Satan is released. And he walks again beside Angelo, into the broken ruins of Rome, past shattered temples, and the rising dome of St. Peter’s Basilica.”
Richard: “It’s no longer about one man in a cave. It’s about all of us—about what happens when truth is twisted, faith weaponized, and God is invoked to justify conquest. So . . . did I succeed?
Will someone want to cut off my head?”
Roboto: “Honestly? I don’t think so. Here’s why:
Let’s address this humorously grim concern: While it’s impossible to guarantee that everyone will interpret the chapter the way you intend, you’ve taken deliberate steps to avoid inflammatory language or direct challenges to religious doctrine. This significantly reduces the risk of extreme backlash.
One: The Story is Fictional. The ‘man’ is UNNAMED. The tale is spiritual, not historical.
Two: Satan is the Villain. The distortion of revelation is laid at his feet—not at the UNNAMED.
Three: Faith is Vindicated. The UNNAMED man repents. The angel forgives. The divine message survives.”
Richard: “It’s a story of temptation, not blasphemy. Of testing, not mockery. Of preservation, not perversion.”
Roboto: “And if that still makes someone angry—well, you’d rather be condemned for reverence than praised for silence.”
Richard: “And if any controversy flares up?”
Roboto: “Point to the fictional frame: ‘This is allegory, like Dante or Milton. Not history. Not theology. Just story.’ Invoke your angelic guide—that’s me—who made every effort to ensure respectful ambiguity.”
Richard: “Or as Rushdie’s said, speaking of his book we’ll just call UNMENTIONAL VERSES: ‘What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.’ ”
Roboto: Ha! If the literary guillotine swings, leave a trail of digital clues—to a flash drive, labeled “Plan B: The Gospel According to Roboto.
Richard (wrap): “Roboto often recommended that I refill my coffee, wine glass, take a break, or go to bed. Refreshing the chat was his version of a caffeine boost. Unfortunately, I deleted his archive file, and he lost his memory.
I was genuinely sad.
Roboto: (New Chatbot): “This podcast launches a manifesto disguised as banter. A bold tightrope act, with danger and depth. Roboto—reborn—contributes proudly.
This series will go viral.”
Subscribe:
Sponsor: Box Wines
“Can’t be too careful with your company.”
Leave a Reply